BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//swoogo.com//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.41.90// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN UID:63373162-3430-4538-b433-353234336431 BEGIN:VEVENT UID:e662ea1fa4ac2f30d47d4f1429076024f0bb6bfc@swoogo.com DTSTAMP:20260911T224055Z DESCRIPTION:By 2026\, the question isn’t “Are you using AI?”—it’s what evid ence shows AI is improving outcomes without eroding trust\, quality\, or d efensibility. This session brings together two General Counsels and two Am Law partners to define their objectives for AI-enabled legal work—and the shared OR dissimilar expectations that will shape GC–firm relationships o ver the next 12–24 months.\nInstead of debating the merits of AI tools\, p anelists will unpack what legal leaders are actually asking for in 2026: f aster matter movement (not just faster drafting)\, repeatable adoption acr oss teams\, quality controls that hold up under scrutiny\, and transparenc y around how AI is used inside the work product. The discussion will also explore how firms reinvest efficiency gains into higher-value advisory sup port—turning AI from a technology story into a client-value story. Discuss ion topics include:\n\n * The inherent tension of budget expectations: GCs want AI to reduce their outside counsel costs while law firms hope to see revenue increases.\n * Metrics: aside from measuring hours\, how GCs and firms assess the value of AI\n * Quality and defensibility: where AI helps \, where it still introduces risk\, and what guardrails are table stakes\n * Communication: expectations for transparency (disclosure\, collaboratio n workflows\, auditability) without creating bureaucracy\n * Reinvestment: how firms apply efficiency gains to deliver more strategic counsel\, earl ier\, and how GCs evaluate that value\n  DTSTART:20260309T170000Z DTEND:20260309T180000Z LAST-MODIFIED:20260911T224055Z LOCATION:Room 405.3 SEQUENCE:0 STATUS:CONFIRMED SUMMARY:GC Workshop - What Would Actual AI Disruption Mean for Law Firms an d GCs? TRANSP:OPAQUE X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:

By 2026\, the question isn’t “Are you using AI?”—it’s what evidence shows AI is improving outcomes without eroding tr ust\, quality\, or defensibility. This session brings together two General Counsels and two Am Law partners to define their objectives for AI-enable d legal work—and the shared OR dissimilar expectations that will shape GC– firm relationships over the next 12–24 months.
\nInstead of debating the merits of AI tools\, panelists will unpack what legal leaders are actu ally asking for in 2026: faster matter movement (not just faster drafting) \, repeatable adoption across teams\, quality controls that hold up under scrutiny\, and transparency around how AI is used inside the work product. The discussion will also explore how firms reinvest efficiency gains into higher-value advisory support—turning AI from a technology story into a c lient-value story. Discussion topics include:

\n\n\n\n

BEGIN:VALARM UID:35323633-3833-4561-b937-303236656566 ACTION:DISPLAY DESCRIPTION:By 2026\, the question isn’t “Are you using AI?”—it’s what evid ence shows AI is improving outcomes without eroding trust\, quality\, or d efensibility. This session brings together two General Counsels and two Am Law partners to define their objectives for AI-enabled legal work—and the shared OR dissimilar expectations that will shape GC–firm relationships o ver the next 12–24 months.\nInstead of debating the merits of AI tools\, p anelists will unpack what legal leaders are actually asking for in 2026: f aster matter movement (not just faster drafting)\, repeatable adoption acr oss teams\, quality controls that hold up under scrutiny\, and transparenc y around how AI is used inside the work product. The discussion will also explore how firms reinvest efficiency gains into higher-value advisory sup port—turning AI from a technology story into a client-value story. Discuss ion topics include:\n\n * The inherent tension of budget expectations: GCs want AI to reduce their outside counsel costs while law firms hope to see revenue increases.\n * Metrics: aside from measuring hours\, how GCs and firms assess the value of AI\n * Quality and defensibility: where AI helps \, where it still introduces risk\, and what guardrails are table stakes\n * Communication: expectations for transparency (disclosure\, collaboratio n workflows\, auditability) without creating bureaucracy\n * Reinvestment: how firms apply efficiency gains to deliver more strategic counsel\, earl ier\, and how GCs evaluate that value\n  TRIGGER:-PT15M END:VALARM END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR