BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//swoogo.com//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.27.21//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:67faf096d5db414906c1725c0200fb24adb105ea@swoogo.com
DTSTAMP:20240329T062719Z
DESCRIPTION:This session is geared towards smaller and medium-sized law fir
ms who want to learn more about the E-discovery process. Here are many of
the questions we will answer:\n\n * Why do large law firms ask for strange
production formats like DAT\, OPT and metadata files with single page tiff
s?\n * Is there an advantage to receiving data in such a format?\n * When
should parties use search terms to respond to document requests and are th
ere other ways to locate responsive data?\n * How can I make sure that my
E-discovery process is defensible and that I won't get sanctioned?\n * Is
there an ideal way to produce text messages in litigation?\n * How do I ma
ke sure the other side is giving me all the documents that are responsive
to my document requests?\n * When should my client hire an expert to foren
sically image computers and phones and when can they avoid the costs?\n *
What can I do to prepare for a meet and confer with opposing counsel regar
ding identification\, collection\, and preservation of data for litigation
?\n * How should I respond to requests for production that aren't precise?
\n\n
DTSTART:20210202T194500Z
DTEND:20210202T204500Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20240329T062719Z
LOCATION:https://www.event.law.com/legalweek-2021/v/s-412748
SEQUENCE:0
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SUMMARY:Navigating the Pitfalls of E-discovery for Boutique Litigators
TRANSP:OPAQUE
X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:
This session is geared towards smaller and
medium-sized law firms who want to learn more about the E-discovery proces
s. Here are many of the questions we will answer:
\n\n- Why do la
rge law firms ask for strange production formats like DAT\, OPT and metada
ta files with single page tiffs?
\n - Is there an advantage to receiv
ing data in such a format?
\n - When should parties use search terms
to respond to document requests and are there other ways to locate respons
ive data?
\n - How can I make sure that my E-discovery process is def
ensible and that I won't get sanctioned?
\n - Is there an ideal way t
o produce text messages in litigation?
\n - How do I make sure the ot
her side is giving me all the documents that are responsive to my document
requests?
\n - When should my client hire an expert to forensically
image computers and phones and when can they avoid the costs?
\n - Wh
at can I do to prepare for a meet and confer with opposing counsel regardi
ng identification\, collection\, and preservation of data for litigation?<
/li>\n
- How should I respond to requests for production that aren't prec
ise?
\n
BEGIN:VALARM
ACTION:DISPLAY
DESCRIPTION:This session is geared towards smaller and medium-sized law fir
ms who want to learn more about the E-discovery process. Here are many of
the questions we will answer:\n\n * Why do large law firms ask for strange
production formats like DAT\, OPT and metadata files with single page tiff
s?\n * Is there an advantage to receiving data in such a format?\n * When
should parties use search terms to respond to document requests and are th
ere other ways to locate responsive data?\n * How can I make sure that my
E-discovery process is defensible and that I won't get sanctioned?\n * Is
there an ideal way to produce text messages in litigation?\n * How do I ma
ke sure the other side is giving me all the documents that are responsive
to my document requests?\n * When should my client hire an expert to foren
sically image computers and phones and when can they avoid the costs?\n *
What can I do to prepare for a meet and confer with opposing counsel regar
ding identification\, collection\, and preservation of data for litigation
?\n * How should I respond to requests for production that aren't precise?
\n\n
TRIGGER:-PT15M
END:VALARM
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR